Judgments affirmed.
The defendant claims that the People failed to prove by competent evidence that the substance sold by him to an undercover officer was in fact cocaine. The expert opinion of three witnesses that such substance was in fact cocaine was based, in part, on the results of certain tests in which the substance was compared with "known standards" — a substance known to be cocaine. However, two of the witnesses testified that they did not themselves...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
