1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 178 Cal.App.3d
  5. 178 Cal.App.3d 180 (1986)
 

BODENHAMER v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A032656.

178 Cal.App.3d 180 (1986)

223 Cal. Rptr. 486

RONALD BODENHAMER et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Respondent; GENERAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

February 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

N.A. Misciagna, P. Richard Colombatto, Dale E. Blunier, Barbara J. Damlos and Misciagna, Schneider & Colombatto for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Jonathan H. Erb, Otto F. Becker and Thornton Taylor & Downs for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

POCHE, J.

The sole issue in this mandate proceeding is whether the Unfair Trade Practices Act (Act) of the Insurance Code (Ins. Code, § 790 et seq.;1 see also § 1620.2) which regulates trade practices in the business of insurance applies to independent claims adjusters. We hold that it does.

I.

In November 1981, Bodenhamer Jewelers was burglarized as a result of which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases