1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 150 Ariz.
  5. 150 Ariz. 208 (1986)
 

McCARTHY v. ARNOLD

No. 2 CA-SA 0366.

150 Ariz. 208 (1986)

722 P.2d 376

Mary McCARTHY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Jack ARNOLD, and the Honorable Robert Buchanan, Judges of the Superior Court, In and For the County of Pima, and Guiseppe GUARRASCIO, Real Party in Interest, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

May 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bury & Moeller by Kevin Miniat, Tucson, for petitioner.

Miller & Pitt, P.C. by Michael D. Stofko, Tucson, for real party in interest.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The issue presented in this special action is whether the trial court erred in refusing to order an examination of the real party in interest as to his inability to give security for costs pursuant to Rule 67, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. We accept jurisdiction to correct a plain and obvious error committed by the trial court. See Amos v. Bowen, 143 Ariz. 324,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases