COURTNEY v. COURTNEY

43093.

256 Ga. 97 (1986)

344 S.E.2d 421

COURTNEY v. COURTNEY.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided June 25, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peters, Peebles, Talley, Townsend, Burns & Millender, Donald N. Peters, for appellant.

Frank W. Virgin, for appellee.


HUNT, Justice.

We granted this interlocutory appeal to address for the first time whether unvested retirement funds are subject to claims for alimony or equitable division of property, and, if not, whether evidence concerning them is otherwise relevant. The trial court denied the husband's motion in limine urging exclusion of any evidence of his unvested retirement plan.

The parties were married for eighteen years and have two children still in their minority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases