Per Curiam.
Appellants argue first that because appellee is already receiving disability benefits he is no longer a "member of the fund" entitled to seek an increased disability award. This argument was addressed and rejected in State, ex rel. Manders, v. Bd. of Trustees (1981),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.