DURHAM COUNCIL OF THE BLIND v. EDMISTEN

No. 149P86.

344 S.E.2d 5 (1986)

316 N.C. 552

DURHAM COUNCIL OF THE BLIND for Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rufus L. EDMISTEN, Attorney General of North Carolina; Mark G. Lynch, Secretary of the Department of Revenue of North Carolina; City of Durham; Ronald L. Stephens, District Attorney for the Fourteenth Prosecutorial District; State of North Carolina.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blanchard, Tucker, Twiggs & Abrams, Raleigh, for plaintiff.

David S. Crump, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Richard N. Weintraub, Asst. City Atty., Durham, for City of Durham.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of significant public interest filed by the Defendants; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases