1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 214 N.J.
  5. 214 N.J. Super. 130 (1986)
 

AMOROSA v. JERSEY CITY WELDING & MACH. WORKS

214 N.J. Super. 130 (1986)

518 A.2d 529

FREDERICK AMOROSA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JERSEY CITY WELDING & MACHINE WORKS (INCORRECTLY REFERRED TO AS J.C. WELDING CO.), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Gayle Loftis argued the cause on behalf of appellant.

Patrick J. McAuley argued the cause on behalf of respondent (Connell, Foley and Geiser, attorneys; George J. Kenny, of counsel; Edward Solensky, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Petitioner-employee Frederick Amorosa appeals from a post-judgment order of the Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) denying his motion for interest pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-28 and a penalty and legal fees pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-28.1 on a judgment he recovered in the Division against respondent-employer Jersey City Welding & Machine Works (incorrectly referred to as J.C. Welding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases