Judgment affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court's charge on intent shifted the burden of proof and that the court should have instructed the jury on the law of agency. However, at trial, upon the defendant's instructions, defense counsel made no request to charge and no exception was taken to the charge as given. Accordingly, any error of law was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Whalen,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
