1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 121 A.D.2d
  5. 121 A.D.2d 217 (1986)
 

BAUR v. WEINSTEIN

121 A.D.2d 217 (1986)

Charles Baur, Individually and Doing Business as Baur's Delivery Service, et al., Respondents, v. Scott Weinstein, Individually and Doing Business as York Delivery Service, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 10, 1986

Special Term lacked authority, under then-existing New York and Bronx County Supreme Court Rules, to order an immediate trial without the consent of the parties, particularly since issue had not been joined. (Rules of Sup Ct, NY & Bronx Counties [22 NYCRR] § 660.8 [a] [5]; Lanza v Penthouse Intl., 79 A.D.2d 957 [1st Dept 1981]; Jacobson v Moskowitz, 31 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases