CITY OF CINCINNATI v. BURROW

No. C-850589.

30 Ohio App. 3d 281 (1986)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE, v. BURROW, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided April 9, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, Paul J. Gorman, city prosecutor, and Patrick K. Dunphy, for appellee.

Frost & Jacobs and Michael L. Cioffi, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal from the Hamilton County Municipal Court.

It is asserted in the case sub judice that a judge of the municipal court erred by finding, on the basis of the evidence adduced at trial in connection with a charge brought pursuant to Cincinnati Traffic Code Section 506-40, that the defendant-appellant, David D. Burrow, had disobeyed a signal controlling the flow of traffic at the intersection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases