PEOPLE v. SINISTAJ


67 N.Y.2d 236 (1986)

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Frank Sinistaj, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Roger L. Stavis and Steven R. Kartagener of counsel), for appellant.

Walter L. Rich for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and TITONE concur with Judge HANCOCK, JR.; Judge ALEXANDER dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion.


HANCOCK, JR., J.

Under this court's decisions in People v Lomax (50 N.Y.2d 351) and People v Osgood (52 N.Y.2d 37), an indictment which replaces an earlier one in the same criminal action should be related back to the original accusatory instrument for the purpose of determining the commencement of the six-month readiness period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases