1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 184 Cal.App.3d
  5. 184 Cal.App.3d 97 (1986)
 

BARTLING v. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER

Docket No. B017666.

184 Cal.App.3d 97 (1986)

228 Cal. Rptr. 847

WILLIAM FRANCIS BARTLING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

August 7, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Richard Stanley Scott and Malley, Rosenfeld & Scott for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

William H. Ginsburg, George James Stephan, Gerald W. Connor, H. Scott Roman and Wood, Lucksinger & Epstein for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

In Bartling v. Superior Court (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 186 [209 Cal.Rptr. 220] (Bartling I), we held that a competent, nonterminally ill adult patient has a constitutionally based right to refuse and/or to terminate medical treatment. We remanded to the superior court for a determination

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases