1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 105 Wn.2d
  5. 105 Wn.2d 175 (1986)
 

STATE v. AMMONS

Nos. 51550-6, 51580-8, 51587-5.

105 Wn.2d 175 (1986)

713 P.2d 719

718 P.2d 796

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROY LEE AMMONS, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

As amended by order May 13, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julie A. Kesler and Raymond H. Thoenig of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellants Ammons and Barton.

Michael Filipovic of Seattle-King County Public Defender Association, for appellant Garrett.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Deborah J. Phillips, Senior Appellate Attorney, for respondent.

David Boerner, amicus curiae for respondent.

[As amended by order of the Supreme Court May 13, 1986.]

GOODLOE, J.

The appellants, Roy Lee Ammons, Dale R. Barton, and Eugene Garrett, challenge the constitutionality of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, RCW 9.94A (hereafter referred to as the SRA), pursuant to which they were sentenced. We hold the SRA is constitutional and affirm their sentences.

The SRA became effective on July 1, 1984. The SRA is a comprehensive sentencing system which establishes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases