TOOTLE v. TOOTLE

No. 85-558.

22 Ohio St. 3d 244 (1986)

TOOTLE ET AL. v. TOOTLE, APPELLANT; ABBOTT ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 19, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Lawrence L. Fisher, Clark E. Loofbourrow and Nancy E. Herrold, for appellant.

Huffer & Huffer Co., L.P.A., and Robert H. Huffer, for appellee Abbott. R. L. Brubaker, for appellee Knisley.


LOCHER, J.

The issue at bar is whether Thomas Abbott and Megan Abbott Knisley, although adopted, may inherit through or from their mother in a class gift. For the reasons to follow we hold that the adopted children may not inherit where the express intention of the testator is otherwise and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Ordinarily R.C. 3107.15(A)(2) places adopted children on the same footing as natural children:

"To...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases