1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 131 Misc.2d
  5. 131 Misc.2d 131 (1986)
 

AMSTERDAM v. GOLDSTICK

131 Misc.2d 131 (1986)

Robert Amsterdam et al., Petitioners, v. David T. Goldstick et al., Respondents.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

January 6, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Amsterdam, petitioner pro se. Lydia Paglio, petitioner pro se. Thomas Stats, petitioner pro se. Jerome R. Halperin and Guy S. Halperin for David T. Goldstick and others, respondents. Bruce Kramer and Sheryl Karp for Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, respondent.

LEWIS R. FRIEDMAN, J.

At the trial of this action the court concluded, inter alia, that the respondent Mark Greenberg did not meet the requirements of Administrative Code of the City of New York § D26-41.03 (a) (3) to serve as the managing agent for a New York City multiple dwelling. (Amsterdam v Goldstick, 128 Misc.2d 374 [Civ Ct, NY County 1985].) In this motion, denominated as one for "reargument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases