NATHANSON v. HERTZ CORP.

Docket No. B016592.

183 Cal.App.3d 78 (1986)

227 Cal. Rptr. 799

GAYLE NATHANSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

July 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Michel & Cerny, Allen L. Michel and Ross Cerny for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Liebman & Reiner and John Reiner for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether The Hertz Corporation, a self-insurer, can be held to the same standards of an insurance company as required by Insurance Code sections 790.01 and 790.03, subdivision (h), infra.1

The Hertz Corporation (Hertz), defendant and respondent, was granted a summary judgment in an action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases