STATE v. BURTEN


207 N.J. Super. 53 (1986)

503 A.2d 907

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARVIN F. BURTEN, RICHARD A. BURTEN AND HOWARD L. KASKEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Craner argued the cause for appellant (Craner, Nelson, Satkin & Glazner, attorneys; John A. Craner and Lori M. Skoller, on the brief).

Lawrence P. Platkin argued the cause for respondent Howard L. Kaskel and Marvin M. Goldstein argued the cause for respondents Marvin F. Burten and Richard A. Burten (Robinson, Wayne, Levin, Riccio & LaSala, attorneys for respondent Howard L. Kaskel; Arnoff & Merin, of counsel; Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, attorneys for respondents Marvin F. Burten and Richard A. Burten; Lawrence P. Platkin, Marvin M. Goldstein and Jerome L. Merin, on the brief).

Before Judges MORTON I. GREENBERG, J.H. COLEMAN and LONG.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by GREENBERG, P.J.A.D.

This matter comes before the court on appeal from an order of the Law Division dismissing an appeal de novo from the Municipal Court of the Township of Union on the ground that it was untimely. The proceedings though quasi-criminal have been prosecuted by a private attorney retained on behalf of the complainant. See R. 3:23-9(d); R. 7:4-4(b).

The case originated when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases