Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record in the instant case, we conclude that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 7-101(A)(3), and 9-102(B)(1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
The respondent contends that his violations, if any, of the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules were not intentional, but resulted from misunderstandings with his clients and a technical application of the rules. However, even assuming that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.