WITCO CHEMICAL CORP. v. PEACHTREE DOORS, INC.

Appeal Nos. 85-972, 85-1453.

787 F.2d 1545 (1986)

WITCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION, etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. PEACHTREE DOORS, INC., etc., Mobay Chemical Corp., etc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 24, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice B. Stiefel, Hubbell, Cohen, Stiefel & Gross, P.C., New York City, argued for appellants/cross-appellees. With him on brief were Marc S. Gross, Ralph R. Palo, James A. Quinton and John S. Pratt, Kilpatrick & Cody, Atlanta, Ga.

Harold Haidt, Brooks, Haidt, Haffner & Delahunty, New York City, argued for appellee/cross-appellant. With him on brief were G.T. Delahunty, Charles G. Mueller, A. Felton Jenkins, Jr. and Bruce W. Baber, King & Spalding, Atlanta, Ga.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.


BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment, after a jury trial, entered on December 4, 1984, amended December 10, 1984, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, holding Witco Chemical Corporation's (Witco) U.S. Patent Nos. 3,846,347 ('347) and 4,248,975 ('975) (collectively called Witco's patents) not invalid and infringed by foam-forming systems and prepolymers sold by Mobay Chemical Corporation (Mobay) and used by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases