1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 803 F.2d
  5. 803 F.2d 1473 (1986)
 

DIMIDOWICH v. BELL & HOWELL

No. 84-1995.

803 F.2d 1473 (1986)

John M. DIMIDOWICH, dba Micro Image, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL & HOWELL, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 6, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Koehler, Jr., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

John R. Reese, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown, & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Dimidowich appeals the district court's summary judgment dismissing his antitrust action, in which he challenged Bell & Howell's ("B & H") policy of refusing to sell replacement parts for its microfilm equipment to independent companies that service B & H equipment. We affirm the dismissal of Dimidowich's claims alleging monopolization, attempted monopolization, unlawful tying, and unilateral refusal to deal. We reverse and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases