TALLMAN v. DURUSSEL

No. 14234-8-I.

44 Wn. App. 181 (1986)

721 P.2d 985

BURNS N. TALLMAN, ET AL, Respondents, v. ROBERT E. DURUSSEL, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

June 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton Hattrup, for appellant.

James F. McAteer and Lenihan, Ivers & McAteer, P.S., for respondents.


RINGOLD, A.C.J.

Robert Durussel appeals a summary judgment holding him liable for principal and interest due on a promissory note payable to Burns Tallman. The facts are not in dispute.

Appellant Durussel entered into an agreement with respondent Tallman, to purchase 25 percent of the common stock of Tallman Machinery Company for $50,000. As part of this transaction, Durussel paid cash in the amount of $21,784.78 and on August 15, 1981, signed a promissory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases