SMITH v. CONSOLIDATED MUT. WATER CO.

Nos. 85-1101, 85-1126.

787 F.2d 1441 (1986)

Eugene E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. The CONSOLIDATED MUTUAL WATER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Benjamin, Boulder, Colo., for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant.

Peter J. Wiebe, Jr. (Richard C. Cockrell, with him on briefs), of Cockrell, Quinn & Creighton, Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Before BARRETT, McKAY and TACHA, Circuit Judges.


McKAY, Circuit Judge.

At trial, Mr. Eugene Smith contended that Consolidated Mutual Water Company fired him because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Consolidated contended that it fired Mr. Smith for falsifying water meter tests. After the jury found for Mr. Smith, the court entered judgment in the amount of $67,028.71, which included "front pay"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases