In the Matter of Israel Ruiz, Jr., Respondent,
v.
Carmelo Saez, Appellant. (And Other Proceedings.)
In the Matter of Ruth A. Potter, Respondent,
v.
Gregory J. Dudek et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent, and Edward Mahoney et al., as Commissioners of Elections and Constituting the Erie County Board of Elections, Appellants.
In the Matter of Anthony R. Depaolo, Respondent,
v.
Edward Mahoney et al., as Commissioners of Elections and Constituting the Erie County Board of Elections, Respondents, and Charles W. Termini, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued August 27, 1986.
Decided August 28, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lucindo Suarez for appellants in the first above-entitled proceedings.
Andrew M. Schnier for respondents in the first above-entitled proceedings.
James C. Brylinski for Gregory J. Dudek and another, appellants in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Mark Matthew Jasen for Ruth A. Potter, respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Patrick J. Quinlivan for Mark G. Giangreco, respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.
James C. Brylinski for appellant in the third above-entitled proceeding.
Howard S. Rosenhoch for Anthony R. DePaolo, respondent in the third above-entitled proceeding.
Roger D. Avent, County Attorney (Judith Bapst-Bobrowski of counsel), for Edward Mahoney and another, respondents in the third above-entitled proceeding.
Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur in Per Curiam opinion.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Per Curiam.
These appeals involve the application of Matter of Pecoraro v Mahoney (65 N.Y.2d 1026) to a range of factual settings. Pecoraro requires that data concerning the number of sheets and number of signatures designating a candidate be indicated on the cover sheet but does not mandate that it be in any particular form, provided the notice and informational purposes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
