Per Curiam.
Toledo first argues that the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court's entry of summary judgment in plaintiff's favor for the reason that defendant failed to oppose plaintiff's motion with evidentiary materials sufficient to satisfy Civ. R. 56(E). That rule provides in pertinent part:
"* * * When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
