QUIMBY v. FINE

No. 14143-1-I.

45 Wn. App. 175 (1986)

724 P.2d 403

MELVIN H. QUIMBY, ET AL, Respondents, v. CHARLES S. FINE, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 20, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald A. Palm and Williams, Lanza, Kastner & Gibbs, for petitioners.

Frederick Ockerman, James Caplinger, and Allerdice & Boyack, for respondents.


REVELLE, J.*

Dr. Charles Fine appeals from the trial court's denial of his summary judgment motion. He maintains that the plaintiffs Melvin H. Quimby's and Rose M. Quimby's wrongful birth action did not fall under the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and was effectively barred by the statute of limitation, RCW 4.16.350. The Supreme Court denied a motion to transfer December 6, 1984. We affirm.

On December 28, 1979, Dr. Fine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases