1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 107 Wn.2d
  5. 107 Wn.2d 112 (1986)
 

BLUE SKY ADVOCATES v. STATE

No. 52433-5.

107 Wn.2d 112 (1986)

727 P.2d 644

BLUE SKY ADVOCATES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 30, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mansfield, Reinbold & Gardner and Rodney M. Reinbold, for appellant.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Shirley W. Battan, Assistant, for respondent.

DURHAM, J.

Blue Sky Advocates (Blue Sky), a nonprofit corporation, characterizing this as an action against the Attorney General, claims that either a malpractice claim or the private attorney general doctrine entitles it to attorney fees and other expenses of its involvement in Energy Facility Site Evaluation Counsel (EFSEC) hearings. The trial court dismissed Blue Sky's action on summary judgment. We affirm the trial court and hold that RCW 80.50.080 does not contemplate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases