1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 798 F.2d
  5. 798 F.2d 1392 (1986)
 

A.B. DICK CO. v. BURROUGHS CORP.

Appeal Nos. 86-562, 86-645.

798 F.2d 1392 (1986)

A.B. DICK COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. BURROUGHS CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dugald S. McDougall, Chicago, Ill., argued, for appellant/cross-appellee. With him on brief was Keith V. Rockey. Edgar H. Schmiel and Peter S. Lucyshyn, A.B. Dick Co., Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Charles W. Bradley, Davis Hoxie Faithful & Hapgood, New York City, argued, for appellee/cross-appellant. With him on brief were Steven D. Glazer, Kevin R. Peterson and Gordon K. Harris, Jr., Burroughs Corp., Detroit, Mich. of counsel.

Before RICH and BALDWIN, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

JACK R. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

These are cross-appeals from decisions of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 617 F.Supp. 1382, 228 USPQ 65 (N.D.Ill.1985).1 In No. 86-645, Burroughs Corp. ("Burroughs") appeals the decision of the district court that A.B. Dick's ("Dick") Sweet patent claims 1, 3, 4, 10-13, 15, 16, 18, 24-26, and 30-33 are not invalid and are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases