NAWROCKI v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Nos. 2302 C.D. 1984, 2303 C.D. 1984, 2304 C.D. 1984, 2305 C.D. 1984 and 2306 C.D. 1984.

97 Pa.Commw. 121 (1986)

508 A.2d 1311

Daniel Nawrocki, individually and for the class he represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Ronald E. Mielewski, individually and for the class he represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Holly Welte, by her Executrix, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Marie Katz, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Mary Ann Brabender, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

May 7, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Levin, Shamp, Levin, Arduini & Hain, for petitioners.

Richard C. Langler, with him, Michael I. Levin and William Fearen, Cleckner and Fearen, for respondent.

Argued October 8, 1985, before President Judge CRUMLISH, JR., Judge COLINS, and Senior Judge KALISH, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE CRUMLISH, JR., May 7, 1986;

Daniel Nawrocki and four other token claimants1 representing the professional employees of the Erie School District (District) appeal Unemployment Compensation Board of Review orders upholding referee decisions and denying them benefits because their unemployment occurred during a summer vacation period between two regular school sessions. Section 402.1(1) of the Unemployment Compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases