DOUGLAS, J.
The issue presented in this case is whether a proffer of excluded evidence is required in every situation to preserve, for appellate review, an evidentiary ruling which is alleged to be in error. We answer in the negative.
Evid. R. 103 provides, in pertinent part:
"(A) Effect of erroneous ruling. Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which admits or excludes evidence unless a substantial right of the party is affected, and
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
