GROHS v. GOLD BOND BLDG. PRODUCTS

No. 84 C 7999.

627 F.Supp. 1555 (1986)

Dennis GROHS, Plaintiff, v. GOLD BOND BUILDING PRODUCTS, a DIVISION OF NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

February 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Baliunas, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Richard E. Lieberman and William M. O'Reilly, Ross & Hardies, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, District Judge.

Both sides in this age discrimination case have moved for summary judgment. Each supports his motion with exhibits, depositions and affidavits, most of which tend to shed more heat than light on the question of whether age was a determining factor in defendant's decision to fire plaintiff. Because only a trier of fact can sort out what happened, both motions are denied.

I. Facts

Plaintiff's complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases