CATLIN v. WASHINGTON ENERGY CO.

No. 85-3570.

791 F.2d 1343 (1986)

Lawrence Clare CATLIN, d/b/a Heatsavers of Puget Sound, and James C. Fry, James A. Fry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WASHINGTON ENERGY COMPANY, a Washington corporation; Washington Natural Gas Co., a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Washington Energy Company; Thermal Energy, Inc., a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Washington Energy Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 13, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine Koehler, Lopez & Ackerman, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Thomas C. Armitage, Frank Birkholz, Cartano, Botzer, Larson & Birkholz, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

Before WRIGHT, TANG and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

In this case we are asked to decide whether the advertising or sale of consumer products by a state-regulated natural gas distribution monopoly violates the Sherman Act or Washington antitrust law, based on a theory of "monopoly leveraging." The district court found no antitrust violations, and we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Lawrence Catlin, James C. Fry and James A. Fry, appellants, were in the business of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases