1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 22 Ohio
  5. 22 Ohio St. 3d 191 (1986)
 

STATE EX REL. COMMERCIAL LOVELACE MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. v. LANCASTER

No. 85-649.

22 Ohio St. 3d 191 (1986)

THE STATE, EX REL. COMMERCIAL LOVELACE MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., APPELLANT, v. LANCASTER ET AL.; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 26, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Robert E. Tait and P. Douglas Barr, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Sheryl L. Creed, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The issue before us, based upon the procedural posture of this case, is whether the commission abused its discretion in finding appellant violated a specific safety requirement.1 For the attendant reasons, we affirm the judgment below and decline to issue the requested writ.

For this court to grant a writ of mandamus with respect to a decision by the Industrial Commission, it is incumbent upon the relator to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases