STATE v. MEYER


212 N.J. Super. 1 (1986)

512 A.2d 1139

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BILL MEYER OF READERS SHOCASE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda G. Harvey argued the cause for appellant (Greenberg, Dauber & Epstein, attorneys; Melvin Greenberg and Linda G. Harvey, on the brief).

Paul Giblin, Paramus Municipal Attorney, argued the cause for respondent (Giblin & Giblin, attorneys; Giblin, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, BILDER and GRUCCIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Defendant Readers Shocase appeals from a Superior Court, Law Division ruling that Paramus Borough Ordinance No. 77-6 is constitutional and not preempted by State law. Defendant was found guilty and fined in the municipal court for violating obscenity Ordinance No. 77-6, which regulates the public display of magazines containing nudity. The Superior Court, Law Division, denied defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases