1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 799 F.2d
  5. 799 F.2d 1327 (1986)
 

SOUZA v. ESTATE OF BISHOP

No. 84-2641.

799 F.2d 1327 (1986)

Albert SOUZA and Seiyei Matsuda, etc., Plaintiffs, and Valentine Merseberg and Ruth Chun, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Bernice Pauahi BISHOP, and its Trustees Frank E. Midkiff, Richard Lyman, Jr., Hung Wo Ching, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Wisch, Alvin H. Goldstein, Jr., Goldstein & Phillips, San Francisco, Cal., Thomas T. Watts, Kemper & Watts, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants.

G. Richard Morry, David J. Reber, Martin Anderson, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees.

Before FERGUSON, CANBY and HALL, Circuit Judges.

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs separately own two single family residences located on leased property owned by the Bishop Estate in Hawaii. In what appears to be a novel theory under the antitrust laws,1 plaintiffs have alleged: that the Bishop Estate has unlawfully monopolized the market for leaseholds by imposing a lease-only system on consumers of single family residences; that the Bishop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases