WILLS v. FRANK HOOVER SUPPLY

No. 85-1872.

26 Ohio St. 3d 186 (1986)

WILLS ET AL., APPELLEES, v. FRANK HOOVER SUPPLY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 25, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burman, Robinson & McCarthy Co., L.P.A., Dennis M. McCarthy, William C. Becker, Morrison, Myer & Bindley and Peter J. Myer, for appellees.

Morrow, Gordon & Byrd and L. James Gordon, for appellants.


Per Curiam.

The sole issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in granting the appellants' motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the court of appeals is reversed as to appellant Bowerston, and affirmed as to appellant Hoover.

It is axiomatic that a motion for summary judgment shall only be granted when there is no genuine issue as to any material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases