MAJERS v. SHINING MOUNTAINS

No. 85-100.

711 P.2d 1375 (1986)

Fred W. MAJERS, Cecila Majers, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. The SHINING MOUNTAINS, a California limited partnership, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided January 7, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randy Dix, argued, Helena, Jones & Hoffman, Chester Lloyd Jones, argued, Virginia City, Landoe, Brown, Planalp, Kommers & Johnstone, Bozeman, for defendant and appellant.

Poore, Roth & Robinson, Urban L. Roth and Charles R. Anderson, argued, Butte, for plaintiffs and respondents.


GULBRANDSON, Justice.

Appellant, Shining Mountains, appeals an order of the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, Madison County, granting plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. The District Court held that Shining Mountains had an implied covenant to construct improvements indicated on a recorded plat. The order also stated the covenant could be enforced through specific performance. We reverse and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases