IN RE POTTS

OSB 81-52; SC S31433.

718 P.2d 1363 (1986)

301 Or. 57

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Clarence A. POTTS, M. Lyle Trammell and Terry G. Hannon.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark McCulloch, of Powers, McCulloch & Bennett, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for accused Clarence A. Potts.

Jack L. Kennedy, of Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland, argued the cause for accused M. Lyle Trammell. With him on the brief and reply brief was Susan E. Watts, Portland.

Joe D. Bailey, of Landis, Bailey & Mercer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief and reply brief for accused Terry G. Hannon.

John S. Marandas, of Bloom, Marandas & Sly, Portland, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar. Mark M. Williams, Portland, filed the brief for Oregon State Bar.


PER CURIAM.

This attorney discipline case involves three attorneys. It arises out of their representation of the estate of Florin J. Becker, deceased. The Oregon State Bar filed complaints against Clarence A. Potts (Potts), M. Lyle Trammell (Trammell), and Terry G. Hannon (Hannon), charging excessive fees (DR 2-106(A) and (B)) and fee splitting (DR 2-107(A)).

The Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases