1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 804 F.2d
  5. 804 F.2d 1233 (1986)
 

ESPENSCHIED v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD.

Appeal Nos. 86-1004, 86-1217.

804 F.2d 1233 (1986)

Peter ESPENSCHIED, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 12, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Dobrovir, Dobrovir and Gebhardt, Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner, with him on the brief, was David L. Sobel.

Deborah Stover-Springer, Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; on the brief for respondent were Llewellyn M. Fischer, Acting General Counsel, Mary L. Jennings, Associate General Counsel for Litigation, David C. Kane, Reviewer for Litigation and Michael K. Martin, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Consolidated petitions for review of two decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or board). In Appeal No. 86-1004, Peter Espenschied (Espenschied), appeals from the board's decision in Docket No. DC531D8510569, dismissing Espenschied's appeal from Department of the Navy's denial of his within-grade salary increase. We affirm.

In Appeal No. 86-1217, Espenschied appeals from the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases