WIMMER v. MVD

84-1498-E; CA A39516.

730 P.2d 1297 (1986)

83 Or.App. 268

In the matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of William D. WIMMER. William D. Wimmer, Respondent, v. Motor Vehicles Division, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 31, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Clayton C. Patrick, Grants Pass, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Michael L. Mowrey, and Burrows, Hull, Mowrey & Thompson, Grants Pass.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) appeals from the circuit court judgment on remand from this court, Wimmer v. MVD, 75 Or.App. 287, 706 P.2d 182, rev. den. 300 Or. 367, 712 P.2d 109 (1985), which reinstates MVD's order of suspension, suspending petitioner's driving privileges for one year, as required by ORS 482.545(1).1 MVD argues that the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases