IN THE MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF MAHITKA AND MAHITKA

30180; CA A34742.

719 P.2d 1305 (1986)

79 Or.App. 541

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Jeanette M. MAHITKA, Respondent, and Daniel R. Mahitka, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold L. Olsen, and Olsen & Huffman, St. Helens, filed the brief for appellant.

Robert P. Van Natta, and Van Natta & Petersen, St. Helens, filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals an order that denied him relief under ORCP 71B(1) and 71C from a judgment of dissolution that was taken against him by default. The parties executed a property settlement agreement which was incorporated in the judgment. Husband's motion asserted that the judgment was taken through mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect, fraud, misrepresentation or other misconduct, and contains errors which ought to be corrected. His concern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases