HORIZON AVIATION, INC. v. PIRFIL (PETE) CAM

Nos. 81-8-34; CA A34625.

722 P.2d 1291 (1986)

80 Or. App. 577

HORIZON AVIATION, INC., an Oregon corporation, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, v. PIRFIL (PETE) CAM, Appellant—Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, for appellant—cross-respondent. With him on briefs was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

William G. Earle, Portland, for respondent—cross-appellant. On brief were Patrick N. Rothwell & Hallmark, Griffith & Keating, Portland.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

This is an action for property damage arising out of defendant's rental of an aircraft from plaintiff. The issue is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for plaintiff, based on its interpretation that the contract was unambiguous and that, therefore, a jury question was not raised.

Defendant purchased a package of flying lessons from plaintiff. The lessons were supposed to extend through his solo flight. Student pilots were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases