1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 722 P.2d
  5. 722 P.2d 1269 (1986)
 

STATE v. HALE

84-1890-C; 84-1890-C; CA A37640 (Control); CA A37641.

722 P.2d 1269 (1986)

80 Or. App. 361

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Roland Everett HALE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, J.J.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant pled guilty to and was convicted of felony driving while suspended (DWS) and driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) for the same act of driving on November 14, 1984. He argues that the trial court had no authority to impose two separate sentences. We affirm.

Defendant was validly convicted of both DWS and DUII. Neither offense necessarily includes acts sufficient to constitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases