KILGORE v. SULLIVAN

101250; CA A34738.

717 P.2d 1220 (1986)

78 Or.App. 631

Claude M. KILGORE, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Dempsy Dallas SULLIVAN, Mary Marjorie Sullivan, Thomas R. Connell, Jr., Barbara B. Sullivan, Dallene Sullivan Connell, and D.D. Sullivan, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellants-Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malcolm L. Brand, Salem, argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents. With him on brief was Paulus, Rhoten, Brand, Lien & McDonough, Salem.

Albert P. Depenbrock, Salem, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on brief was Depenbrock and Wilson, P.C., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARREN, Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action for an accounting, alleging that he and defendant Sullivan1 had formed a partnership, which Sullivan terminated in 1973. Plaintiff contended that he was entitled to one-half of the assets of the corporation which succeeded the partnership in the operation of the business, Kilroy's Mobile Sales. The trial was bifurcated. The trial court first held a trial to determine whether a partnership...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases