1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 793 F.2d
  5. 793 F.2d 1132 (1986)
 

POLO FASHIONS, INC. v. DICK BRUHN, INC.

No. 85-2280.

793 F.2d 1132 (1986)

POLO FASHIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DICK BRUHN, INC.; the Woolen Mill; Richard L. Bruhn; and Larry Pickens, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 10, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton Springut, Morton Amster, Amster, Rothstein & Engelberg, New York City, Neil A. Smith, Limbach, Limbach & Sutton, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

David St. Louis, Sandell, Young & St. Louis, Fresno, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

J. Joseph Bainton, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewit, Maynard & Kristol, New York City, amicus curiae, for International Anticounterfeiting Coalition, Inc.

Before CHAMBERS, SNEED, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

This is a trademark infringement action. The plaintiff, Polo Fashions, Inc. (Polo), prevailed in the district court and received approximately $6,000, the amount of profits the defendants earned from sales of counterfeit Polo shirts. Polo argues that the district court did not award an adequate remedy. We agree in part. Therefore, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I.

FACTS

Polo manufactures a popular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases