I.A.M. NAT. PENSION FUND v. CULLMAN INDUSTRIES

Civ. A. No. 86-0763.

640 F.Supp. 1284 (1986)

I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND PLAN A, A BENEFITS, et al., Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, v. CULLMAN INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant and Counterclaimant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert T. Osgood and Joseph P. Martocci, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs and counterdefendants; Roger B. Hunt and Laura Steinberg, of Sullivan & Worcester, Boston, Mass., of counsel.

John Bodner, Jr., of Howrey & Simon, Washington, D.C., for defendant and counterclaimant.


CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, defendant's Opposition thereto, and plaintiffs' Reply. In addition, the Court has defendant's Motion to Defer Ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiffs' Opposition thereto. Plaintiffs have filed suit to collect withdrawal liability payments owed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases