1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 786 F.2d
  5. 786 F.2d 1124 (1986)
 

ARCADIA MACH. & TOOL INC. v. STURM, RUGER & CO.

Appeal No. 85-2637.

786 F.2d 1124 (1986)

ARCADIA MACHINE & TOOL INC., Appellant, v. STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Wills, Los Angeles, Cal., submitted for appellant.

Charles E. McKenny, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, argued for appellee. With him on brief was David S. Maclay, Marsh, Day & Calhoun, Bridgeport, Conn., of counsel.

Before RICH, DAVIS and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the Order of June 25, 1985, of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the summary judgment motion of Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (Ruger), and holding that Ruger did not violate the false patent marking statute, 35 U.S.C. § 292. Arcadia Machine & Tool, Inc. (Arcadia) relied on only the second and third paragraphs of § 292. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases