1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 784 F.2d
  5. 784 F.2d 1118 (1986)
 

ARROW AIR, INC. v. DOLE

No. 84-1438.

784 F.2d 1118 (1986)

ARROW AIR, INC., Petitioner, v. Elizabeth Hanford DOLE, Secretary of Transportation, Respondent, Professional Association Travel Services, Inc., Rich International Airways, Inc., Spantax, S.A., and United Airlines, Inc., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 28, 1986.

As Amended April 30, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O.D. Ozment, with whom Lawrence D. Wasko, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Alice Owens, Atty., Dept. of Trans., Washington, D.C., of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Alabama, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom J. Paul McGrath, Asst. Atty. Gen., Catherine G. O'Sullivan and Edward T. Hand, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Kenneth N. Weinstein, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel and Robert D. Young, Atty., Dept. of Trans., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Thomas as L. Ray, Atty., Dept. of Trans., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for respondent.

Howard S. Boros, Gary B. Garofalo and Aaron A. Goerlich, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for intervenors, Rich Intern. Airways, Inc. and Spantax, S.A.

Kenneth Berlin, Washington, D.C., was on brief for intervenor, United Airlines, Inc. John R. Keys, Jr., Washington, D.C., and Stephen P. Sawyer, Bentonville, Ark., also entered appearances for intervenor, United Airlines, Inc.

Marc A. Silverstein, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for intervenor, Professional Ass'n Travel Service, Inc.

Before WRIGHT and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges, and MARKEY, Chief Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MARKEY.

MARKEY, Chief Judge:

Arrow Air, Inc. (Arrow) petitions for review of Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) "Interpretation of Regulations Concerning Payment to Direct Air Carrier(s)," ER-1387 and SPR-194 (ER-1387), adopted and made effective August 17, 1984. See 49 Fed.Reg. 33,436 (Aug. 23, 1984).1 We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Regulatory Background<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases