1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 106 Wn.2d
  5. 106 Wn.2d 84 (1986)
 

CLARK v. HORSE RACING COMMISSION

No. 51942-1.

106 Wn.2d 84 (1986)

720 P.2d 831

DON M. CLARK, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE HORSE RACING COMMISSION, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 12, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Lanza, Kastner & Gibbs, by Randy J. Aliment and Joseph J. Lanza, for appellants.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Larry Watters, Assistant, for respondents.

PEARSON, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the Washington Horse Racing Commission validly promulgated an amendment to WAC 260-70-100, which prohibited horse owners from participating in purse distribution in the event their horses were found to be in violation of the permitted medication standards. We hold the Commission failed to comply with the format and style provisions for amending existing sections under RCW 34.04.058(1), (3).

On August 18...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases