1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 717 P.2d
  5. 717 P.2d 1169 (1986)
 

D.C. THOMPSON AND CO. v. HAUGE

TC C-7286; CA A32426; SC S31602.

717 P.2d 1169 (1986)

300 Or. 651

D.C. THOMPSON AND COMPANY, Respondent On Review, v. David B. HAUGE and Michele L. Hauge, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 1, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair J. Henningsgaard, Brownhill & Henningsgaard, Astoria, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners on review.

Elizabeth A. Baldwin, Astoria, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent on review.

Before LENT, P.J., and LINDE, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

LENT, Justice.

There are two issues. The first is whether failure to file a timely undertaking on appeal is a jurisdictional defect. The second is whether after a verdict is received and the jury is discharged, juror affidavits may be received and a new trial ordered based upon juror error in interpreting the effect of the verdict. As to the first issue, we hold that the untimely filing of the undertaking was not a jurisdictional defect. As to the second, we hold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases