IN RE NAITO

Docket No. B022128.

186 Cal.App.3d 1656 (1986)

231 Cal. Rptr. 506

In re ARLENE KIMIE NAITO on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

November 19, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wilbur F. Littlefield, Public Defender, Laurence M. Sarnoff and John Hamilton Scott, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Carol Slater Frederick and Carol A. Greenwald, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.


OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner Arlene Kimie Naito contends that she was unlawfully committed to the Department of Corrections when her parole was revoked for, in her words, "becoming mentally ill." The matter is before this court pursuant to an order to show cause issued by the Supreme Court.

Although petitioner has been released from custody, she is still on parole and subject to parole revocation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases